The Green Revolution was highly productive
agricultural techniques developed since the 1960s that entail that the use of
new hybrid plant varieties combined with larger applications of chemical
fertilizers and pesticides. The term is generally applied to agricultural
changes in developing countries, particularly India. The Green Revolution had
its positive and negative effects on the countries that were introduced
to it. Some of the positive were, it helped agricultural growth keep up with
population growth, and it helped developing countries to become more self
sufficient. Although the Green Revolution had its positive effects, it also had
it negatives; such as serious environmental problems that resulted from the
chemical dependency of the new crop strains, and social problems, such as only
the more prosperous farmers were able to afford the new seed strains,
irrigation equipment, farm machinery, fertilizers, and pesticides. Many of
these harmful pesticides that are used are not only harmful to the environment,
but are also harmful to the human body as well. The Green Revolution has fed
many of the South Asian population more many decades, but it still remains
unclear on if it will be able to continue to do so.
Belize, however, did not
participate in the Green Revolution. It is believed that one of the main
reasons that Belize did not participate in the Green Revolution was because
they produce cacao (or chocolate beans), and to produce cacao they must grow it
organically and with an agro-forestry-based-system. If they were to participate
in the Green Revolution then they would be harming the environment, and potentially harming
the cacao industry.
Figure 1: Pictured above is some of the different types of Cacao beans in Belize. |
Figure 2: Pictured above are two Indian boys who are using harmful pesticides because of the Green Revolution. |
Works Cited:
Rowntree, Les, Martin
Lewis, Marie Price, and William Wyckoff. Globalization and Diversity:
Geography of a Changing World. Fourth ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
Prentice Hall, 2008. Print
Figure Sources:
Figure 1:
https://www.google.com/search
Figure
2: https://www.google.com/search
No comments:
Post a Comment